Home » Articles \ Tags: Barack Obama, Health care, Health Insurance, healthcare, Reform
A Modest Health Care Proposal
Getting Serious About Health Care Reform
[This article was originally published in the Philadelphia Bulletin]
Enough dithering! President Barack Obama says it’s time to act on health care. I agree.
But act how? Are we really going to be happy with the pussy-footing proposals floating around Congress? All the so-called reformers want to do is tinker with insurance regulations. But how effective would that be, considering that the insurance companies themselves support the changes?
We have taken our eyes off the ball, people. Let’s get back to first principles. Mr. Obama’s premise is that we have a right to health care. A right.
America was founded on the idea of rights — inalienable rights. No one can take them away. I assume that when people say that health care is a right, they mean that health care is an inalienable right. Mr. Obama apparently agrees. In his speech before Congress he called for free services, such as physical exams, colonoscopies, and mammograms. Free! You have a right to those things.
Well, OK. But why stop at free preventive services? Why not free treatments, free surgery, free drugs, and so on? We need those things as much as a physical exam. If we have a right to health care and if we are unable to obtain those services, our rights have been denied or violated. That is something the advocates of health-care “reform” say we must not tolerate.
Okay, let’s not tolerate it. Let’s make sure no one’s right to health care is violated. Let’s get serious for a change.
But how? I can think of only one efficient way to accomplish this. Let’s enslave the providers of medical services — doctors, nurses, paramedics, dentists, chiropractors, acupuncturists, psychiatrists, and the rest. My proposal may shock people, but I am confident that this feeling will wear off as we think about how logically it flows from the principle that we have a right to health care.
First, let me point out that there is no other good alternative. Any other system designed to deliver health care as a matter of right will have gaps through which the least fortunate inevitably will slip. Isn’t that the problem we’re trying to fix? Obama’s approach isn’t much better. He wants to force the insurance companies, with taxpayer subsidies if necessary, to insure everyone — healthy or sick, young or old — at the same price. He might even like a government insurance option, though he can’t make up his mind whether or not that is an essential feature of his plan.
Regardless, it’s a bad plan. Requiring insurance companies to pay for our medical care misses the point. Where do you think insurance companies get their money? From us! What kind of right to health care is it if we end up paying for it anyway? Obama means well, but his plan is a shell game.
On the other hand, enslaving the doctors and other providers would have none of the defects of the current system or the leading reform plans. It goes right to the source. We have a right to health care? Fine. Force the doctors to provide it.
Of course, this wouldn’t be free. I’m no pie-in-the-sky utopian. The doctors and the others would have to be fed, clothed, and housed. They’d need certain comforts. That’s understood. But it would be far easier to keep a lid on costs by enslaving the providers than by the patchwork system we have now, or would have under Mr. Obama’s plan.
The biggest problem I can see is that if doctors are going to be our slaves, no one will want to be a doctor. Most people don’t relish the idea of being slaves even in the national interest. They’re selfish that way.
We certainly can’t be a world-class country without doctors and nurses, so I have a solution to this problem: conscription. President Obama should direct the nation’s schools to look out for students with an aptitude for biology and direct them into medical studies. Then, at the appropriate time, the government should draft those young people into the newly created U.S. Medical Service Corps.
I know what you’re thinking: As word of this got around, the best students will play dumb. If that happens, we’ll have no other choice than to pick our doctors by lottery.
Categories: 
Sheldon, be careful. Your tongue is so firmly planted in your cheek you may choke. Trust me, I am a doctor.
Your reasoning is spot on. When I have attempted to make the analogy of slavery in other web responses I am told, “..you made the choice to be a doctor so you are no slave…” It is amazing how people think they are entitled to my time and knowledge.
At noon today in the doctor’s lounge another doc said “..well at least the government should provide the education for free…”. FREE! There is nothing free. Hell, soon the air we breath will not be free! I guess he is ready to sign up for the shackles you offer, or at least commit future young people to them. I do not know which is worse, trying to crawl out from under 200-300 K in education debt and ever increasing cost of doing business thanks to gov. intrusion with an uncertain professional future, or what you propose. At least in the first scenerio one can file for bankruptcy and go in another direction.
One thing is certain. It will never get to what you suggest because then the government would be liable for any harm their slave does. Today the government gets off “free” for the harm they do. I guess there is such a thing as “free”.
21 September 2009 at 2:21 pm