Link to the FEE Library

Home » Document \

The Mainspring of Human Progress

Weaver’s book offers human liberty as the “mainspring of human progress.” The book begins with a series of puzzles about why we are so much better off than our ancestors and then explores why systems lacking liberty haven’t worked. The bulk of the book is an historical look at how the “revolutionary” idea of liberty struggled to dominate and eventually did. Weaver finishes with a discussion of the “fruits of freedom” as seen from the late 1940s.

page rule

Also from the FEE Library


Letter from Leon Trotsky to Henry Hazlitt on November 12, 1931 by Leon Trotsky
Letter from Bolshevik revolution leader Leon Trotsky to Henry Hazlitt on November 12, 1931.

The American Tradition by Clarence B. Carson
In this book written in 1964, Carson offers a history of the United States in which each chapter focuses on an element of what he sees as the unique American tradition of liberty. Chapters cover topics such as “republican government,” “individualism, “free economic intercourse,” and “virtue and morality.” Carson argues that the US Constitution was [...]

Cliches of Socialism Number 58 by Dean Russell
“Government should control prices, not people.”

The Inflation Crisis and How to Resolve it by Henry Hazlitt
Originally published in 1978, this volume is a revision and major extension of Hazlitt’s What You Should Know about Inflation from 1960. The first part is the revision and the remaining three-fourths is new material reflecting the serious inflation problems of the mid-1970s. Hazlitt present not only an Austrian perspective on inflation, he offers critiques [...]

Victims of Social Leveling by Leonard E. Read by Leonard E. Read
Leonard E. Read discusses the flaws of “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.” In practice this idea, of social leveling, would harm everyone in the long run.

2 Comments »

  1. [...] actually think through what it truly would mean in practice. In 1953, Leonard E. Read, in his “Victims of Social Leveling,” correctly showed it would mean suppressing creativity by coercion, resulting in negative [...]

  2. [...] “Victims of Social Leveling” by Leonard E. Read [...]

Have your say!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2009 | Foundation for Economic Education | 30 S Broadway, Irvington-on-Hudson, NY 10533 | 1-800-960-4FEE (1-914-591-7230) | Fax 1-914-591-8910 | Log in