Home » Cliches of Socialism, Document \ Tags: Cliches of Socialism, free markets, Leonard E. Read
Cliche of Socialism Number 8 “The Free Market Ignores the Poor”
Cliche of Socialism Number 8 “The Free Market Ignores the Poor” by Leonard E. Read.

Also from the FEE Library
Economic Harmonies by Frederic Bastiat
An inspiring exposition of the natural harmony that results when people are free to pursue their individual interests. Bastiat uncovers a great truth: there is no inherent antagonism between the welfare of one and the welfare of all. In a free-market society all people can live in peace and prosperity.
Cliches of Socialism Number 2 by Paul L. Poirot
“If we had no Social Security, many people would go hungry.”
The Inflation Crisis and How to Resolve it by Henry Hazlitt
Originally published in 1978, this volume is a revision and major extension of Hazlitt’s What You Should Know about Inflation from 1960. The first part is the revision and the remaining three-fourths is new material reflecting the serious inflation problems of the mid-1970s. Hazlitt present not only an Austrian perspective on inflation, he offers critiques [...]
Carl Menger and Early Austrians by Paul Cwik
Professor Paul Cwik’s 2010 PowerPoint presentation “Carl Menger and Early Austrians.”
Review of Leonard Peikoff’s Ominous Parallels by Roy A. Childs, Jr. by Roy A. Childs, Jr.
Review of Leonard Peikoff’s Book Ominous Parallels by Roy A. Childs, Jr. from Laissez Faire Books, Inc Review August 1982.

Categories: 







[...] In today’s document, Roy A. Childs Jr. opens his review of Leonard Peikoff’s book The Ominous Parallels: The End of Freedom in America with: “When the history of the twentieth century is written, one thing will stand out above all others: the growth of state domination over the lives of all mankind. The state has brought us wars, concentration camps, mass murder. Millions of graves are filled with the results.” And it is not by accident that these tragedies committed by the State occurred. Ideas can be a dangerous thing if taken in the wrong direction. [...]
20 December 2011 at 10:59 pm