If Goods Don't Cross Borders...


The quote “When goods don’t cross borders, soldiers will” is often attributed to the 19th century French Liberal economist Frederic Bastiat. Bastiat was a man with a talent for the written word, and we have countless great quotes from his pen (amazing considering his life was so short and the majority of his writing was only in the last few years of his life). Economist Joseph Schumpeter even called him one of the great economic journalists in his famous book on the history of economic thought (though he also put him down in the same breath, calling him no theorist). And this quote is certainly something Bastiat would have believed. There is, however, little to no evidence he actually said these words.

Still, even FEE has long given Bastiat credit for the quote. In today’s document Leonard Read writes, in a September 16, 1952 letter, to Rose Wilder Lane, one of the great classical liberals of the 20th century herself, asking her for the source. It is doubtful she found it. Still, while it is still possible Bastiat is the originator, we do know there is a quote from Otto T. Mallery, a late 19th century liberal, in his “Economic Union and Enduring Peace” which states, “If soldiers are not to cross international boundaries, goods must do so. Unless the Shackles can be dropped from trade, bombs will be dropped from the sky.” So, the question remains, are we falsely attributing Mallery’s words to Bastiat? Or did Mallery get it from Bastitat or somewhere else?

Regardless of its source these words ring true. The idea can be traced back even further to the 18th century in Montesquieu’s 1748 work L’esprit des Lois or the Spirit of the Laws. In this work Montesquieu discusses the civilizing effect commerce has upon societies. Further, in a more modern context, Ludwig von Mises in Human Action discusses the importance of social cooperation, which Henry Hazlitt also uses as the foundation of his book the Foundations of Morality; trade has the effect of increasing social cooperation by allowing us to specialize and expand the division of labor. This is beneficial for everyone in society because it allows us to do more than is possible if everyone was in isolation. In other words, trade allows us to work together for our own benefits. We become dependent, in a good way, upon each other, which allows for greater cooperation and wealth. Take this away and conflict is the likely alternative outcome.

So irrespective of who said it, the lesson is clear and important: free trade not only increases the wealth of different societies, it might also be necessary for peaceful interaction.

Download the September 16, 1952 letter from Leonard Read to Rose Wilder Lane here.


* indicates required
Sign me up for...


April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF





Image from Shutterstock

Which Way Do You Lean on Economic Theory?

Whose approach do you find yourself taking more often, Mises's or Friedman's? Read both quotes and choose the one that aligns with your opinion of what makes for good economics.