EVENTS

Evening at FEE: Ayn Rand's Moral Defense of Capitalism

Start Saturday, November 05, 2011 6:15 PM

End Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:30 PM

We invite you to join us on Saturday, November 5 for an Evening at FEE. Our guest will be Yaron Brook, President and Executive Director of The Ayn Rand Institute.

Rejecting previous attempts to defend the self-interested nature of markets–including Adam Smith’s famous “invisible hand” theory–Ayn Rand defined a whole new way of thinking about self-interest, and in doing so, provided an indispensable moral foundation for free markets.

The Evening at FEE event will begin with a small reception at 6:15 p.m., the lecture will begin at 7:30 p.m.

Due to the enormous interest this event is now SOLD OUT. FEE has reached its seating capacity. If you have RSVP’d and cannot come to the event, please contact Katie O’Connell.

Check out our YouTube Channel for this and other free-market lectures.

Location

30 S. Broadway
2011-11-05 21:30:00, NY 10533
View Map of Location

Event Contact

Contact: Katie O'Connell
Phone: (914) 591 7230
Email: koconnell@fee.org

ABOUT

TSVETELIN M. TSONEVSKI

Tsvetelin Tsonevski is director of academic affairs at FEE. He holds an LL.M. degree in Law and Economics from George Mason School of Law.

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

Spooner v. Bentham on Natural Rights

Which way do you lean on natural rights? Who do you find yourself agreeing with most often, Spooner or Bentham?