NEWS

Strategic Notes from FEE—Bricks & Mortar

MAY 01, 2014 by WAYNE OLSON

Dear Friend of FEE,

FEE has entered into a contract for sale of its historic headquarters in Irvington-on-Hudson, NY and is consolidating its operations in rented office space in Atlanta. We are expecting to close the sale and complete the move by the end of the year.

From a business perspective, this was an inescapable decision. Emotionally, it was gut-wrenching.

The owner of real estate faces the risks that, over time, the structures will become less sound, the footprint less useful, and the location less suitable. All three risks became reality for FEE.

Physically, the structures are 125 years old, enormously expensive to operate and seriously in need of repairs and replacements.

Functionally, the footprint is too large for our publishing business and too small for our educational business.

It wasn’t always too large for the publishing business, as is illustrated by the above photograph of dedicated FEE employees in the 1950s. Today, however, substantially all of the work pictured there is either automated or outsourced.

It wasn’t always too small for the seminars, but demand for FEE seminars has skyrocketed. We’ve been able to double the size of our seminars at half the cost per head by holding them on college campuses throughout the country.

The location, close to New York City, was expedient for an educator and publisher in an era of difficult transportation and costly communication. In today’s environment, for such an organization, seeking (as FEE is) to build out its talented team and expand its audience network, it is expedient to be in a lower-cost regional center with excellent airline connections. 

To preserve the memories of our heritage, even as we grow beyond the limitations of the property, we will certainly retain the most valuable books and artifacts from the Irvington mansion and feature them in our Atlanta offices when we move into permanent space.

Parting with the Irvington property is very painful for us who work here and for countless friends of FEE, for whom the property carries vivid memories of life-changing experiences and extraordinary people.

It’s a lovable and magnificent old pile, no matter how many repairs it needs. It played a pivotal role in the movement for liberty in the US in the second half of the 20th Century. Many of the movement’s leaders met, performed research and taught in the FEE mansion. Generations of students got their first exposure to the freedom philosophy from seminars conducted on the premises and from the steady stream of books and magazine articles emanating from it.

Still, we had to resolve the question, are we about investing in freedom’s next generation or about preserving memories of the last generation’s heroes by maintaining an expensive museum? Viewed in that light, there was no real choice in the matter.

As always, please do not hesitate to contact me at executivedirector@FEE.org with any questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Wayne Olson

Executive Director

ABOUT

WAYNE OLSON

Wayne is FEE's Executive Director.

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

July/August 2014

The United States' corporate tax burden is the highest in the world, but innovators will always find a way to duck away from Uncle Sam's reach. Doug Bandow explains how those with the means are renouncing their citizenship in increasing numbers, while J. Dayne Girard describes the innovative use of freeports to shield wealth from the myriad taxes and duties imposed on it as it moves around the world. Of course the politicians brand all of these people unpatriotic, hoping you won't think too hard about the difference between the usual crony-capitalist suspects and the global creative elite that have done so much to improve our lives. In a special tech section, Joseph Diedrich, Thomas Bogle, and Matthew McCaffrey look at various ways these innovators add value to our lives--even in ways they probably never expected.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

Spooner v. Bentham on Natural Rights

Which way do you lean on natural rights? Who do you find yourself agreeing with most often, Spooner or Bentham?