April Freeman Banner 2014

ARTICLE

A Majority of One

JUNE 01, 1975 by JO NATHAN

Jo Nathan is a homemaker, of Lakeview, Oregon.

Until recently, I had so much faith in the intelligence and integrity of women that the growing noise over "equal rights" (which I have always claimed) failed to disturb me. As time went on, however, I found myself doing something I thoroughly disapprove of; putting labels on people. I have kept my labels few and simple: 1) male, 2) female, 3) Man, and 4) Woman.

By accident of birth we enter this world as male or female. By our own effort and maturing we become Man or Woman.

For as long as I can remember, I have admired great women and men, identifying more with the women, of course. My parents and teachers encouraged me to believe I could become successful at anything I attempted, providing I possessed the innate ability and the willingness to work. They taught my brothers the same thing.

My older brothers encouraged me in my "tomboy" attitude of equality, explaining to my mother that tomboys usually grow up understanding men and how to get along with them. I believe my brothers were right. I still have great respect for the men I meet. It is a pity their number is dwindling. However, I am not prepared to work alongside boys over 21 years of age, who show no interest in becoming men. I confess to being impatient with them. But I am even more impatient with aging girls. Perhaps because of ingrained habit and tradition, I still expect more from females than I do from males.

In their search for "change" in their society, too many idle females have worked on shallow levels, such as changing the suffix man to person (chairman becomes chairperson, etc.). It is not strange to me that they did not seek to change the basic word, Woman to Woperson. They show no real awareness of the meaning of the word, WOMAN, and the responsibility and discipline required to wear such a beautiful, powerful name.

A brief UPI news release concerning a convention of feminists stated that four different leaders "told delegates" to do this or not do that… A new flag was waved at the delegates. The new flag is labeled "minirape." Minirape was then defined as a physical or verbal intrusion on the rights of women as human beings. Then, the person who defined the word told the other persons at the meeting what to do about such an intrusion.

I maintain that women have already learned how to handle such situations. In most cases they prevent "intrusion" by behaving as women. We are aware that men are victims of minirape also, possibly more frequently than women. Do they need someone to tell them what to do about it?

My temper is flaming again. It does every time I read things like this from a news release: Women were told to watch for and demand removal of textbooks if they show women in the traditional, lesser role of homemaker… 

Like many other women, I prepared for and chose the role of homemaker. I have never thought it is lesser and I still do not think it is, although many have tried to make me believe it.

Who are these brainwashed females who would like me to become a carbon copy of themselves and my children a carbon of their own? This "majority of one" refuses to accept the invitation to join the club. They have a right to think and become whatever they wish, but their freedom ends where mine begins!
 

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

June 1975

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION