Freeman

BOOK REVIEW

A Reviewer's Notebook - 1977/11

NOVEMBER 01, 1977 by JOHN CHAMBERLAIN

Awake, for Freedom’s Sake (Founda­tion for Economic Education, Ir­vington, N.Y., 192 pages) is Leonard Read’s twenty-second book. Like most of its predecessor works it makes its case for the free market in distinctively moral terms. The free market is better not only because it makes for more efficient production, it is better because it builds on the exercise of individual wills, which forces responsible men to think in ways that lead one straight to the Golden Rule as the governing principle of life.

Leonard Read does not claim to be an original in his promotion of a philosophy that is as old as the Ten Commandments, which state the case for "life, liberty and property" in grand negatives ("Thou shalt not kill," "Thou shalt not steal," etc.). But he remains a master of the sly juxtaposition that makes him such an excellent teacher. He invokes the prophet Isaiah, who exhorted his lis­teners to "awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust." Dust, of course, is infinitesimal. Mr. Read makes the point that all our "numerous know-hows" are, taken separately, rather infinitesimal in nature. As he has said before, no single man can make a pencil! But the sum total of low "specks of dust," when they are permitted to operate in freedom amounts to something fairly substantial. If we realize our own individual investments in the "counties; millions of know-hows experienced by others" we will be ready, writes Isaiah, to "awake and sing."

In the same essay that quotes Isaiah on dust, Mr. Read tosses off a phrase about "wall-to-wall socialism." Man’s goal, he says, is, with the help of others, "to shake loose his ‘dustiness’ as best he can." But what can you do when "wall-to-wall socialism" hides the dust under the carpet?

A Mirage of Prosperity

Even in Russia, Mr. Read notes, there is a leakage of creative human energy from underneath the carpet. Moreover, the wall-to-wall socialists depend utterly on the transfusions they get from the relatively free societies on the other side of iron and bamboo curtains. In several es­says Mr. Read remarks on the "mir­age" that causes people to think that State interventionism is the cause of prosperity. "What gives socialism the appearance of working," he says, "is the freedom socialism has not yet destroyed." Because the many "dusts" of American "know-how" are still combining to produce the "pleth­ora of goods and services no other people on earth have ever experi­enced," State interventionism has not yet managed to kill prosperity. But the masses, who see "socialism advancing as never before in Amer­ican history," are deluded by poli­ticians who claim credit for causing a plenty which will surely disappear when there is no more freedom for energy to flow.

We live, so Mr. Read reminds us, on thrusts from the past. The Sumer­ians, practicing the freedom philos­ophy, gave us the first schools, the first bicameral Congress, the first case of tax reduction and the first moral ideals. Sumerian freedom lasted for four centuries, until "the city-state of Lagash had become a total bureaucracy—all parasites and no hosts." Then the world was pushed back into "the same old mess" until a "second exception oc­curred in Athens." The Venice of Marco Polo (1250-1325) was another exception, with a "freedom to pro­duce and to exchange with others thousands of miles away."

In the time of Louis XVI Turgot tried to apply the principles of the 18th century French Physiocrats ("a fair field and no favoritism") to gov­ernment, but he couldn’t hold his king to a strong policy. Nevertheless the Physiocrats had their effect on Adam Smith, whose Wealth of Na­tions, in turn, affected the thinking of the American Founding Fathers. Now, with the multiplication of scores of sub-governments in Washington, we are in danger of forgetting the Founders. It could be "the same old mess" once more if we don’t "awake for freedom’s sake."

Bits of Autobiography

Mr. Read is not given to per­sonalities, even personalities about himself. But he does give us a few tantalizing bits in this book about his personal history. He tells how he first came to despise the hell of war. He and a school roommate applied for acceptance in the aviation signal corps in 1917. The roommate was rejected—and "dejected"—but Leonard was accepted and dis­patched on the liner Tuscania for France.

Then the Tuscania was torpedoed and sunk in the Irish Sea, Leonard was rescued and debarked in Ire­land. Since telegraphic services were out of order, he happened to be listed as a nonsurvivor in his Michi­gan hometown newspaper. His school roommate, angry at the pre­sumed loss of a friend, went to Canada, got into the Canadian in­fantry, and was in the front line trenches in France in two weeks. Six months later he was in the hospital with twelve shrapnel wounds, half of them still open. That was the last Leonard Read ever heard about his roommate.

There are other bits of autobiog­raphy in Awake for Freedom’s Sake, but only enough to whet the appe­tite. I could stand a lot more infor­mation about Leonard Read’s experiences as a General Manager of the Los Angeles Chamber of Com­merce. His efforts to keep California on the straight path during the period when Upton Sinclair was proposing the EPIC (End Poverty in California) plan for socialism con­vinced him that education, not polit­ical action, was the key to stopping the spread of socialist ideas. Accord­ingly, he came East with the idea of starting the Foundation for Economic Education.

He was, in short, a crucial link in an important process of osmosis that has revived the freedom philosophy not only in America but in Britain. In "accentuating the positive" about freedom, Leonard Read does not de­pend on the economists alone. The Index of his twenty-second book con­tains 148 name references to philosophers, religious leaders, his­torians, poets, novelists and belle lettrists where there are only eleven name references to economists.

It is Leonard Read’s widespread culture as well as his economic understanding that provokes letters such as the one from England which I received the other day about The Freeman. The letter spoke of the achievement of "Leonard Read Henry Hazlitt and… other colleagues" as "the brightest beacon it a lowering sky; and as I think A. J Nock once wrote, what is so exciting is that you will never know what your own teaching and writing impels other people to think, to believe and to achieve."

 

THE CAPITALIST READER

Edited by Lawrence S. Stepelevich (Arlington House, 165 Huguenot Street, New Rochelle, New York 10801 )

272 pages

Reviewed by David A. Pietrusza

This book offers an admirable selec­tion of free market writings from Adam Smith to Milton Friedman. It includes excerpts from Frederic Bas­tiat; essays by such representatives )f the Austrian School as Boehm-­Bawerk, Mises, Stolper and Hayek; and the thoughts of such forceful exponents of the capitalist ideal as Ayn Rand, John Chamberlain, and Lawrence Fertig.

"The attack launched against capitalism… was never grounded n the issue of productivity," writes, the editor, "but rather in the issue of is morality. Does a system based on competition, self-interest, and monetary profit befit the true nat­ure of man? Are freedom and jus­tice possible within such an economic matrix, or must the economics be changed to ensure that these values prevail? It is to these issues that the capitalist apologist must address himself…"

It was Bastiat who argued that liberty and the free market are opposed to all forms of plunder and spoliation. Bastiat urged mankind to "reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledge­ment of faith in God and His works."

Under the regimes of plunder, the powerful use political leverage to gain economic advantage, but when liberty prevails no one enriches himself at the expense of another. "Nobody is needy in the market economy because of the fact that some people are rich," writes Lud­wig von Mises. "The riches of the rich are not the cause of the poverty of anybody. The process that makes some people rich is, on the contrary, the corollary of the process that im­proves many peoples’ want satisfac­tion. The entrepreneurs, the capitalists, and the technologists prosper as far as they succeed in best supplying the consumers."

Nevertheless—and despite its es­timable track record of solid achievement—free enterprise con­tinually comes under attack from those advocating redistributionist schemes in the name of a nebulous "common good." To obtain such an end result the freedom of the indi­vidual must necessarily be sac­rificed on an altar of state power; governmental and bureaucratic con­trols must be imposed. "The tribal notion of the ‘common good’," writes Ayn Rand, "has served as the moral justification of most social systems—and of all tyrannies—in history. The degree of society’s en­slavement or freedom corresponded to the degree to which that tribal slogan was invoked or ignored." Wilhelm Roepke, an architect of the West German industrial revival, acknowledges that "the economic function of private ownership tends to be obstinately underestimated," but points out that the free society is sustained by a moral base. "The truth is that a society may have a market economy and, at one and the same time, perilously unsound foundations and conditions, for which the market economy is not responsible but which its advocates have every reason to improve or wish to see improved so that the market economy will remain politically and socially feasible in the long run…. The market is only one section of society. It is a very impor­tant section, it is true, but still one whose existence is justifiable and possible only because it is part of a larger whole which concerns not economics but philosophy, history, and theology."

The market as a moral imperative is thus more than ably defended and from a variety of perspectives. While this volume provides opening glimpses into the works of the major defenders of the capitalist system, it also furnishes a significant look into this all-important aspect of the rationale for freedom.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

November 1977

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION