Freeman

THOUGHTS ON FREEDOM

Capitalism and Natural Disasters

Prosperity Saves Lives

JANUARY 01, 2006 by DONALD BOUDREAUX

Here are the ten deadliest hurricanes to strike the United States since 1900:

1. Galveston, Texas, 1900 (between 8,000 and 12,000 persons killed)
2. Florida ,1928 (1,836 killed)
3. Hurricane Katrina, 2005 (approximately 1,200 killed, still unofficial)
4. New England, 1938 (at least 600)
5. Florida Keys, 1935 (423)
6. Hurricane Audrey, 1957 (390)
7. Southeast U.S., 1926 (372)
8. Louisiana, 1909 (at least 350)
9. Atlantic Gulf, 1919 (at least 287)
10. Louisiana, 1915 (275)

The most striking thing about this list is that it contains only two hurricanes from the past half-century: Audrey and Katrina. The other big killers punched into the U.S. mainland quite long ago.

This fact is even more striking in the light of the list below: the ten most powerful hurricanes to strike the U.S. since 1900:

1. Florida Keys, 1935
2. Hurricane Camille, 1969
3. Hurricane Katrina, 2005
4. Hurricane Andrew, 1992
5. Florida and Texas, 1919
6. Lake Okeechobee, 1928
7. Hurricane Donna, 1960
8. Louisiana, 1915
9. Hurricane Carla, 1961
10.Hurricane Hugo, 1989

Six of these ten most powerful storms have struck during the past half-century, yet only one of them (Katrina) is among America’s ten deadliest hurricanes. Even given Katrina’s awful devastation, the long-term trend is for hurricanes to kill fewer people than in the past.

Many factors explain this pattern, including the precise location of each storm’s landfall. But surely the most important reason why hurricanes today are less deadly than in the past is that we are much wealthier. Of course, we have more sophisticated weather-forecasting and hurricane-tracking technologies, which better alert people to danger. But just as important is the spread of radio, television, telephones, cell phones, and the Internet. These communications technologies enable more and more people, increasingly irrespective of their particular locations, to gain instantly the latest information about coming bad weather and about the range of alternatives for escaping it.

In addition, building materials have improved, making walls and roofs sturdier. And in many places throughout the typical American home, ordinary glass has been replaced with plastic-infused glass that is shatter-resistant.

Automobile ownership is more widespread, and automobiles themselves are more reliable and, hence, more trustworthy to jump into quickly for long drives to safer locations. (It must be said: the automobile saved countless lives in New Orleans by enabling car owners to escape Katrina.) In the 1920s and 30s, many fewer people owned cars, and those who did could not trust their vehicles to get them from, say, Galveston to Dallas without breaking down along the way.

Another benefit of our modern times is better health care. Antibiotics weren’t available for much of the first half of the twentieth century; today they are commonplace. Of course, what’s true of antibiotics is true of countless other medicines and medical procedures. Many lives that would have been lost to hurricanes before World War II are today saved by routine medical practice.

Not to be overlooked are improved and less-expensive household appliances, such as gasoline-powered generators, solar-powered flashlights, battery-powered televisions, and gasoline-powered chainsaws. Items such as these enable families stricken by violent weather to better survive whatever calamities befall their properties. Likewise with many ordinary grocery items. Bottled water, super-pasteurized milk, and inexpensive canned goods provide survival opportunities denied to pre-World War II Americans.

Finally, search and rescue efforts today are more effective because of our great wealth. For example, more-reliable automobiles, airplanes, and helicopters ensure that rescue workers get to disaster scenes more quickly and more surely than in the past. And the greater wealth of fellow citizens enables them and inspires them to be more generous with their own time and resources in helping victims of natural disasters.

And what makes all these modern marvels possible? Markets—commerce—entrepreneurs’ passion for profitable success at pleasing consumers, and consumers’ insistence on getting the best deals that they can. Although typically criticized by intellectual elites as being grimy and unpleasant, markets in fact are unsung heroes at saving lives.

This truth can be seen not only by looking back at our own history, but also by looking at other regions today where markets are not as free—and, hence, prosperity is not as great—as it is now in the United States.

In the summer of 2003, between 35,000 and 50,000 Europeans were killed by a heat wave that struck that continent. In France alone, the death toll from this severe weather was 14,802; that is, in France alone a heat wave killed thirteen-and-a-half times more people than Katrina killed.

Why? Were temperatures in Europe especially brutal that summer? The average high daily temperature during that month-long heat wave, according to the Journal of the American Medical Association, was 95 degrees Fahrenheit; the highest temperature recorded was 104 Fahrenheit (on multiple days). While these temperatures are indeed intense and much higher than normal for Europe, they are not so high as to be inescapable with air-conditioning. And yet, sadly, Europeans have much less air-conditioning than do Americans because they are less prosperous than Americans.

When in July 2000 the temperature in New York (where my family and I then lived) reached 106 for two straight days, we were decidedly uncomfortable whenever we ventured outdoors, but not once were we close to death. A major reason, of course, is that we had air-conditioning in our cars, in our homes, in our workplaces, and in each of the stores we visited.

Although we didn’t think of it consciously—for it is so common in the United States today—air-conditioning not only enhanced our comfort, it might well have saved our lives. It certainly did save the lives of thousands of Americans that summer (as it does every summer) who would otherwise die without it.

Of course, widespread availability of reliable air-conditioning is one of the many fruits of material prosperity. It is truly a lifesaver. Indeed, were it not for air-conditioning, many of the people tragically killed by Katrina would surely have died months or years earlier in New Orleans’s brutal subtropical summers. While it’s proper to attribute their deaths in August and September 2005 to that awful hurricane, it’s also important that we bear in mind that many of their lives were extended by air-conditioning and other too-easily-criticized or ignored benefits of capitalism.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

January/February 2006

ABOUT

DONALD BOUDREAUX

Donald Boudreaux is a professor of economics at George Mason University, a former FEE president, and the author of Hypocrites and Half-Wits.

comments powered by Disqus

CURRENT ISSUE

May 2013

From natural systems to human systems, we start to notice patterns in nature that are products of good flow. Adrian Bejan discusses this crucial insight--and how it makes freedom even more needful--in this month's interview. Zachary Caceres looks at what emergence can tell us about the universe, the market, the heart, and the sacred; Mike Reid recounts the tragedies produced when the State tries to impose its order on people who have already developed their own; Gary Galles channels Leonard Read: the State is a clenched fist, he says, so it cannot create; Brad Taylor says democracy might just be another imposed order in some situations; Karl Borden wonders whether an individual's right to be left alone can be part of the order of things; and much, much more.Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

The Arena is a monthly debate feature designed to help readers explore issues of concern to classical liberals/libertarians.

This month, the issue is Gay Marriage. The proposition is: Gay Marriage Expands Liberty. Richard Lorenc will be arguing for the proposition. Steve Esposito will be arguing against the proposition.

img E-mail Subscription

VIEW PRIVACY POLICY