Freeman

ARTICLE

Cliches of Socialism

NOVEMBER 01, 1960

 

When a devotee of private property, free market, limited government principles states his position, he is inevitably confronted with a barrage of socialistic cliches. Failure to answer these has effectively silenced many a spokesman for freedom.

The Foundation for Economic Education is preparing a new series entitled

Clichés of Socialism.

These are printed on single 81/2"x 11" sheets. Single copies for the asking. Quantities at 1¢ each. Now ready are suggested answers to the follow­ing clichés:

1. "The more complex the society, the more government control we need.’”

2. "If we had no social security, many people would go hungry."

3. "The government should do for the people what the people are unable to do for themselves.’”

4. "The right to strike is conceded, but…”

5. "Too much government? Just what would you cut out?"

6. "The size of the national debt doesn’t matter because we owe it to ourselves."

7. "Why, you’d take us back to the horse and buggy.”

8. "The free market ignores the poor."

For sample copies (no charge), write to:
The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc., Irvington-on-Hudson, N. Y.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

November 1960

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION