Freeman

ARTICLE

Defining "Terrorism" Down

Can a silver coin undermine a nation?

MARCH 30, 2011 by WILLIAM L. ANDERSON

In this politicized age, government officials are constantly expanding the meaning of “terrorism.” Once upon a time a “terrorist” was someone who killed or attempted to kill unarmed civilians in a surprise attack that was meant to make a political statement or to undermine a political regime.

That was then. Today, according to a federal prosecutor, a “terrorist” can be someone who privately creates and circulates a silver coin adorned with the dollar sign and denominated in dollar amounts but has a metallic value far above its face value. In fact, the coin in question was similar to the silver dollars that once circulated regularly in this country but have since disappeared. The prosecutor, Anne Tompkins, declared:

Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism. While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country. We are determined to meet these threats through infiltration, disruption, and dismantling of organizations which seek to challenge the legitimacy of our democratic form of government.

This dastardly act of “terrorism” was committed by 67-year-old Bernard von NotHaus, who recently was convicted in federal court in North Carolina by a jury that deliberated for under two hours. He faces the rest of his life in prison for minting and circulating the Liberty Dollar. The Asheville Citizen notes: “The government also is seeking the forfeiture of about 16,000 pounds of Liberty Dollar coins and precious metals valued at nearly $7 million.”

It is sheer nonsense that von NotHaus engaged in behavior that is a “clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country.” But that’s a good description of Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve.

As one who remembers when the Johnson administration announced in 1965 that it no longer would make silver dimes, quarters, half-dollars, and dollars (replacing them with the infamous “sandwich” coins), I can say the charge that creating a silver coin undermines the U.S. economy is a howler. From QE1 and QE2 (quantitative easing) to the Fed’s inflation targets, if anyone has broken the very spirit of the act that will send Bernard von NotHaus to prison, it is Bernanke.

If von NotHaus did anything, he exposed the sorry fact that the U.S. government’s currency is hopelessly debased. If that is terrorism, then anyone who openly criticizes the monetary system is a terrorist. One wonders if prosecutors like Tompkins think the next level of terrorism prosecution is to go after those critics.

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

July/August 2014

The United States' corporate tax burden is the highest in the world, but innovators will always find a way to duck away from Uncle Sam's reach. Doug Bandow explains how those with the means are renouncing their citizenship in increasing numbers, while J. Dayne Girard describes the innovative use of freeports to shield wealth from the myriad taxes and duties imposed on it as it moves around the world. Of course the politicians brand all of these people unpatriotic, hoping you won't think too hard about the difference between the usual crony-capitalist suspects and the global creative elite that have done so much to improve our lives. In a special tech section, Joseph Diedrich, Thomas Bogle, and Matthew McCaffrey look at various ways these innovators add value to our lives--even in ways they probably never expected.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION