April Freeman Banner 2014

ARTICLE

Do No Harm

We must get the government out of medicine to provide the best care at an affordable cost.

JUNE 01, 1993 by JANE M. ORIENT M.D.

This article is adapted from a statement by Dr. Orient on behalf of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons before the White House task force on health care reform, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., March 29, 1993.

I am Jane Orient, Executive Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. I am in the solo practice of private medicine in Tucson, Arizona. I speak as a physician who is bound by the Oath of Hippocrates.

By my oath, I must refrain from doing harm to my patients, and I must abstain from mischief and corruption. I may not promise my patient a three-minute remedy and then give her a deadly potion.

Furthermore, I must “follow that method of treatment which according to my ability and judgment I consider for the benefit of my patients.” I may not subordinate my judgment to that of a secret council. I may not sacrifice my patient’s welfare to a social agenda. I may not deny my patient a cancer treatment or heart surgery so that his resources can be used to benefit someone with a higher social priority, such as a person who is entitled to a free checkup.

I want the best medical care for my patients and for all Americans. We cannot provide the best until we get the cost down.

We will not lower costs by abolishing the Oath of Hippocrates and destroying the patient-physician relationship. The Oath of Hippocrates dates to the fifth century B.C.; the acceleration of American medical costs dates to 1965.

Costs skyrocketed because the government got into medicine. Costs will not decrease until we get the government out of medicine:

out of private physicians’ offices, where regulations are driving physicians out of business, especially in rural areas and inner cities;

out of hospitals, where compliance costs add a huge administrative overhead;

out of the pharmaceutical industry, where government adds $250 million to the cost of marketing a single new drug;

out of the medical marketplace, where government intervention has destroyed the normal economic mechanisms that keep costs reasonable in a free market.

We need to bring patients back into the financial equation. We must allow patients to benefit from their prudent spending and saving decisions. All Americans should be permitted to use pre-tax dollars to establish their own medical savings accounts.

To preserve excellence in American medicine, we must preserve patients’ freedom of choice—not turn it into the sham of picking Monolith A or Monolith B, both offering the same government-dictated benefits package.

If government forces us all into a bureaucratically managed system, we will still have something called “health care,” delivered by persons called “health care providers.” But such a system will have no place for ethical physicians, whose Oath forbids them to accept a situation of conflict of interest with their patients.

Government bureaucracy has never controlled costs. The promise of universal access to comprehensive service under a global budget and government rules is, in a word, bankrupt.

Government officials do not take an oath to do no harm. What a government system can accomplish is to destroy the art and science of medicine in these United States of America.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

June 1993

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION