April Freeman Banner 2014

ARTICLE

Ecorses Grand Experiment

DECEMBER 01, 1989 by GREG KAZA

Greg Kaza is Vice President for Policy Research at the Mackinac Center, a Midland, Michigan, public policy think tank

At first glance, Ecorse, Michigan, appears an unlikely place for a grand experiment. Aging steel mills dominate the landscape in the 2.2- square-mile community of 11,000, located in a region known as Downriver Detroit. Down-river is typical of many of the “Rust Bowl” areas that dominate America’s once-great industrial heartland. Row after row of small, wood-frame houses stand in the shadows of the mills, home to three generations of steelworkers. Along West Jefferson Avenue, the bars and fast-food establishments are fighting a battle against creeping blight. Crack cocaine dealers have invaded from Detroit, decimating several surrounding neighborhoods.

But look beneath the surface and you will find evidence of a grand experiment unique in recent American history. Three years ago, Ecorse teetered on the brink of economic bankruptcy, the result of a $6 million budget deficit mused by wasteful local spending.

Today, the deficit has virtually disappeared, along with most of the Ecorse city government, which has been privatized to the point of near-extinction. “We have created a model city that nobody else in the country has,” explains Louis Schimmel, the man responsible for Ecorse’s grand experiment. “Some communities have pri vatized certain functions. I’ve privatized just about everything. Everything that I could legally.”

Ecorse was unique before Schimmel’s appearance on the scene. It was the first Michigan community to be placed in receivership. Chief Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Richard Dunn appointed Schimmel receiver for the troubled community on December 3, 1986, after city officials failed to comply with repeated court orders to balance the budget.

Symbolic of the budget crisis was Ecorse’s animal control officer, paid $45,000 annually. “That’s an awful lot for collecting dead dogs,” Schimmel said. “I told Judge Dunn I didn’t want the [receiver's] job if I had to do what the typical politician has to do, which is make promises and then chase the taxpayer’s money to keep them. That’s how Ecorse got in the mess that it is in today in the first place.”

Schimmel’s first act as receiver was to discharge 40 paid political employees from the Ecorse payroll. “Cost was not important in Ecorse even though they were near-bankrupt. Having their political buddies, cronies, relatives, and friends on the city payroll had become more important than the taxpayers,” he said. Schim-mel’s second step was privatizing the 34-member Department of Public Works. Motor vehicle maintenance, snow removal, street and sidewalk repairs, tree trimming, water meter reading, weed cutting, and a myriad of other activities are now performed by the private sector. For an encore, Schimmel sold the DPW building and the department’s equipment. “They’re gone. It’s going to be difficult if not impossible to resurrect them from the dead,” he said.

Garbage collection was already handled privately, but Schimmel renegotiated the contract at a savings of $120,000. “It is important that contracts are monitored on a regular basis,” he said. The city boat-launching facility was privatized. The city lost money under government control but is now turning a profit. Surplus buildings and abandoned city lots were sold to reduce the budget deficit, which_ has been cut to $1 million.

Michigan law prevented Schimmel from altering Ecorse’s police department, but he privatized the pension fund, restoring fiscal sanity to a system once underfunded by $15 million. Under the fire union contract Schimmel renegotiated, the current full-time force will become a part-time and volunteer department through attrition. “We have a long list of applicants for the new positions. They don’t seem to mind that it’s not full- time. They just want to work,” Schimmel said.

Few Ecorse departments have escaped Schim-mel’s budget-cutting. The city’s work force, once 140, has been reduced by more than 60 percent through privatization. There have been exceptions. The duties of the $45,000 animal control officer were contracted to the neighboring city of River Rouge. “We pay half their costs and both of us save money,” Schimmel said.

Privatization is frequently characterized as a “Sun Belt” or “Republican” idea. The Ecorse example proves otherwise. Downriver is synonymous with the so-called “Rust Belt,” and Michigan Treasurer Robert Bowman, a Democrat, is among those supporting Schimmel. Bowman and Governor James Blanchard may turn to Schim- mel to resolve a $4.4 million budget deficit in River Rouge. “There isn’t a community Down-river where I wouldn’t use privatization,” Schim-mel said. “That includes River Rouge.”

Not everyone is impressed with Ecorse’s grand experiment. Labor unions representing former city employees have criticized the receivership, portraying Schimmel as an economic czar with an abrasive personality. Officials responsible for the $6 million deficit contend the privatization of city services has gone too far.

For his critics, Schimmel has a ready response. “They knew bankruptcy was coming with that kind of spending, but they didn’t do a damn thing about it. We did.”

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

December 1989

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION