April Freeman Banner 2014


History is With Him


From The Indianapolis Star, March 10, 1959.

To date, no one has accused Presi­dent Eisenhower of being a deep student of history, but apparently he has delivered himself of a com­ment which is backed by the weight of a great deal of history.

He is credited by Life magazine with having said at one of his National Security Council con­ferences, "Damn it, when are you going to learn that national se­curity and a sound economy are the same thing?"

This is a rather crude expres­sion of a profound fact which takes people and nations a long time to grasp. Yet, this simple statement has a great deal of validity insofar as history is con­cerned.

The communists have fully ac­cepted this as a central point in their attack on the capitalist, or free enterprise, systems of the world. They know that more na­tions have died from the lack of a sound economy than have ever been killed off by external enemies. In fact, history has recorded that the assaults by outsiders are not suc­cessful until the internal structure of a nation has been weakened.

So far, there are some in this country who have refused to be­lieve what history teaches. They insist that national security is purely a military endeavor in which the number, size, and cap­abilities of arms determine the safety of the State. They refuse to believe that an obsession with military might can be as damag­ing as direct attack. They are will­ing to build ever larger armed forces, even at the risk of destroy­ing the system which these instru­ments of war are designed to pro­tect.

The nation does need military protection and it must have the capability of meeting reasonably anticipated assaults from external enemies. But if the economy which creates these armed forces is destroyed in the process of building them, then what is there left to defend?

The brief history of the Con­federate States of America is a capsule case in point. At the out­set of the Civil War, the armies of the Confederacy provided it with national security; but as the war wore on, the economy of those states was less and less able to sustain the military effort. Some historians will argue that the Con­federacy died not so much on the battlefield as in the failure to achieve a sound, productive eco­nomic system.

President Eisenhower’s blunt statement of the interrelationship between national security and a sound economy is one of the most heartening bits of news to come from the nation’s capital in some time.


Ideas on Liberty        

James Madison

War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instru­ments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.


June 1959

comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required
Sign me up for...


April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF