Lessons from New Zealand
OCTOBER 01, 1960
The following items, as instructive for Americans as for New Zealanders, are from the April 1960 issue of Liberator, the official journal of The Constitutional Society for the Promotion of Economic Freedom and Justice in New Zealand, Inc.
Bigger Pay Margins Among Communists
The process of equalizing incomes irrespective of the capacity or will to work has probably gone further in
Complete equality should be the objective in the communist countries, but they are nowhere near as close to achieving it as is
In the Soviet army, the pay scales vary vastly between privates and generals, the disparity being much greater than in the western forces. Russian scientists are paid enormously more than laborers. In this way, the Communists encourage ability and application.
At a recent meeting at New Plymouth, the Minister of Finance made some interesting admissions. He was asked if the government party’s policy was still towards the equalization of incomes.
He said the party was "well beyond the stage" of wanting that. But he added, "We have got to face facts. Some people, such as scientists and technicians, have to be paid a greater reward than others, or we lose their services."
The inference is that salary scales are based on the availability of workers in certain professions, not on the worth of their services to the community. This might well be considered thoughtfully by university staffers who have recently gained substantial increases in salaries.
If there were more of them offering, or if those already here were less liable to go overseas for better rewards, they might not have received the increase.
But apart from the practice of reducing margins for skill and ability, to which all recent New Zealand governments have contributed, the policy of steeply grading income tax has been effective in still further reducing margins.
The chief result is to bring ever closer the millennium of mediocrity to which
Social Security Gone Mad
In a recent broadcast, the Minister of Social Security said cash benefits were now paid to 1,037,000 people, which meant that almost one in every two New Zealanders was now receiving a cash benefit, quite apart from health benefits.
According to the last Budget, the cost of social security in the financial year just ended was estimated at £104,000,000—an increase of £15,000,000 in one year. New benefits already announced for this year promise to put up the cost at least as much again, so the taxpayers will probably have to find at least £120,000,000 to finance the scheme.
Where does this money come from? From the pockets of the people, of course. A fair proportion comes from taxation on companies which cannot benefit in any way. This means that the products of those companies cost more than they would otherwise, and it is ultimately the customers who pay the company taxes.
Social security undoubtedly has an inflationary effect in forcing up prices. Judging from the complaints by aged beneficiaries published in letters to newspapers that the present benefit provides only a subsistence, those beneficiaries are little better off today on £4/5/—a week than they were on £ 1/10/—a week when social security began in 1939. Inflation has eaten up two-thirds of the value.
The war cannot be blamed for more than a small portion of the decline in the value of money. In the war years, in fact, inflation was held in check much more successfully than it has been since.
Unless inflation is checked, age beneficiaries may need 10 a week before many more years pass. But how can inflation be checked while taxes amount to more than 30 per cent of the national income?
These are factors which threaten
Instead of boasting of the achievements of social security,
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Give no bounties, make equal laws, secure life and property, and you will not need to give alms. Open the doors of opportunity to talent and virtue, and they will do themselves justice and property will not be in bad hands. In a free and just commonwealth, property rushes from the idle and the imbecile to the industrious, brave, and persevering.