April Freeman Banner 2014


Majority Rule


On a table in the foyer of a small school stood a beautiful decora­tion for the annual open house. It consisted of an elaborate ar­rangement of wax fruit and dried flowers.

One day it was noted that the grapes in the display were disappearing rapidly. A quick check revealed they were providing free after-lunch chewing gum for the students.

The student leaders were assembled and given the project of raising among the 90 students the nine dollars necessary to replace the grapes.

The student body split on the question of who should pay for the grapes. One group thought those who took the grapes ought to confess and pay. The other group wanted everyone to pay, arguing that this would be a good lesson in honesty for everyone, espe­cially those who had seen grapes taken but had done nothing about it. Further, they doubted that the dishonest would confess anyway. After all, if anyone were dishonest enough to take the grapes, he’d probably lie about it rather than confess. Besides, ten cents wouldn’t really hurt anyone.

When this matter came to a vote in one class of 30 students, 16 thought all should pay and 14 thought the grape eaters only should have to pay.

Informal investigation later revealed that those who voted for everyone to pay were themselves grape eaters (or controlled by grape eaters) whereas all others voted that grape eaters only should pay.

Mr. Keith is a school teacher.


March 1961

comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required
Sign me up for...


April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF