April Freeman Banner 2014

ARTICLE

Of Skunks and Salmon

FEBRUARY 01, 1992 by JAMES A. MACCARO

James Maccaro practices law on Long Island, New York.

Environmental bureaucrats are trying to regulate Mother Nature, with disastrous results.

In New Hampshire, state officials attempted to attract recreational fishermen by reducing the state’s skunk population. For a while, the plan seemed to work because it alleviated vacationers’ fears of encountering the odorous beasts. Soon, however, anglers noticed that the fish population also was shrinking, and decided to vacation in neighboring states with more plentiful stocks.

State planners later learned that skunks control the snapping turtle population by eating their eggs. Without the skunks, the turtle population of New Hampshire grew almost unchecked. The over-abundant turtles, in turn, feasted on fish eggs and thus decimated the fish population. Eventually, New Hampshire officials had to import skunks to re-establish the natural balance.

Another attempt to improve on Mother Nature’s work occurred in Montana, where the state introduced mysis shrimp into rivers to feed the salmon which flourished there. However, the tiny shrimp soon consumed large amounts of plankton, which is a major food source for salmon. As a result, the number of salmon spawning in Lake McDonald in Glacier National Park fell from 100,000 to a mere 200. Moreover, bald eagles, which were attracted to the park by the fish, now bypass it. From a peak of 639 in 1981, only 13 bald eagles were last counted in the park.

Because of the chain reaction started in a state bureaucrat’s office, Glacier National Park has an abundance of minuscule shrimp, but few salmon and even fewer eagles. The park thus no longer attracts so many visitors, whose trips to the area to view the eagles greatly contributed to the local economy. From a peak of 46,000 tourists, only 1,000 visited during the 1990 fall season.

Government planners are no more successful in micro-managing the natural world than they are in regulating the economy. When government tries to correct perceived problems, it creates unforeseen results.

The economy, in common with the natural world, is not static. Thus, bureaucrats cannot tamper with it without creating imbalances in the overall system, whether the system be economic or ecological. The results will be counterproductive, whether the state attempts to control the level of wages and prices or of skunks and salmon.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

February 1992

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION