April Freeman Banner 2014


On Campus

MARCH 01, 1956

Intercollegiate debating in the United States goes back to the 1870′s when teams from New York University and from Rutgers challenged one another. Such local rivalries gradually grew into regional contests and, more recently, into a national program with a single resolution selected annually for competition in colleges and universities.*

* A similar national program is conducted at the high school level See “Reaching High School Debaters” in THE FREEMAN, December 1955.

A committee of the Speech Association of America, a department of the National Education Association, drafts four or five resolutions on which college debate coaches vote. The winning resolution becomes the national debate topic for the year.

Recent college debate topics have been: a permanent policy of wage and price controls, a compulsory (federal) fair employment practices law, free trade, and diplomatic recognition to the Communists of China. The current resolution reads:



That the nonagricultural industries of the United States should guarantee their employees an annual wage.

In other words, the college debate teams are examining one version or another of the ancient and continuing debate between economic freedom and political control—open competition versus the welfare state.

From many debate coaches and from students themselves have come pleas for literature and material explaining and upholding the case for the competitive market and limited government. There are so many ways of planning, so many “experts,” so many brilliant arguments for minding all the world’s business except one’s own! Most seriously lacking are sound and appealing arguments in behalf of personal choice and freedom.

The Foundation for Economic Education is striving to help fill that void. Each year, as soon as the college debate topic is announced, Miss Bettina Bien of the Foundation staff assembles and offers on request packets of the best material she can find on the libertarian side of the issue.

The packet available this year, and already requested by approximately 500 college debate teams, emphasizes that a worker’s best guarantee of security lies not in a politically enforced “deal” but in the real bargaining which involves willing exchange with others in a free market economy.


March 1956


comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required
Sign me up for...


April 2014

Around the world, people are struggling to throw off authoritarianism, with deeply mixed results. From Egypt to Venezuela, determined people build networks to overthrow their regimes, but as yet we have not learned to live without Leviathan. In this issue, Michael Malice and Gary Dudney discuss their glimpses inside totalitarian regimes, while Sarah Skwire and Michael Nolan look at how totalitarian regimes grind down the individual--and how individuals fight back. Plus, Jeffrey Tucker identifies a strain in libertarianism that, left unchecked, could reduce even our vibrant movement to something that is analogous to the grim aesthetic of architectural brutalism. The struggle for our lives and freedom is a struggle for beauty; it begins inside each of us.
Download Free PDF