Freeman

ARTICLE

Perspective: Understanding Property Rights

Private Property Rights Are Key to a Prosperous Society

FEBRUARY 01, 1997 by JANE S. SHAW

This issue of The Freeman focuses on property rights, but not in a heavy, theoretical way. Think of it as a potpourri of information on the subject.

You’ll have a chance to read about how property rights quiet squabbling children, how property rights preserved natural resources for Native Americans, and how property rights are routinely violated by governments, American and foreign.

As Thomas Sowell points out in Knowledge and Decisions, both socialist and free-market countries have property rights. The difference is that in socialist countries the government owns and assigns them. In free-market or capitalist countries, individuals have them and—what is especially important—can transfer them voluntarily through mutual agreement.

My goal is to help us recognize that these private property rights are the foundation of a cooperative society (a point that modern communitarians have yet to discover). But I also want readers to understand that private property rights aren’t always formally described in legal documents. They can be understood rather than spelled out, as property rights are in community-run fishing territories. Ownership can be shared by families or clans, rather than individuals alone.

Property rights can change over time. F.A. Hayek described property rights as a modifiable and very complex bundle whose most effective combinations have not yet been discovered in all areas. Sometimes it’s difficult to have full private property rights, even though we have them nominally. As Richard Stroup notes, even though we have rights against pollution of ourselves or our property, these rights may be difficult to defend.

There’s much to be said about private property rights. I hope that these stories will enhance your understanding of what they achieve for our society and why they should be respected.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

February 1997

ABOUT

JANE S. SHAW

Jane Shaw is president of the Pope Center for Higher Education Policy.

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION