Freeman

ARTICLE

The Effort of Every Man

DECEMBER 01, 1965 by HENRY HAZLITT

"No ordinary misfortune, no or­dinary misgovernment will do so much to make a nation wretched as the constant progress of phys­ical knowledge and the constant effort of every man to better him­self will do to make a nation pros­perous. It has often been found that profuse expenditure, heavy taxation, absurd commercial re­strictions, corrupt tribunals, dis­astrous wars, seditions, persecu­tions, conflagrations, inundations, have not been able to destroy capi­tal as fast as the exertions of pri­vate citizens have been able to create it."

So, in the mid-nineteenth cen­tury, wrote Thomas Babington Macaulay in the chapter of his famous History of England de­scribing the state of the country in 1685.

It could easily be proved, he went on, that the national wealth of England had been almost un­interruptedly increasing for at least the six preceding centuries. For example, "in spite of malad­ministration, of extravagance, of public bankruptcy, of two costly and unsuccessful wars, of the pes­tilence and of the fire, it was greater on the day of the death of Charles the Second than on the day of his Restoration." And this economic progress had been pro­ceeding during the nineteenth cen­tury with "accelerated velocity."

Claiming the Credit

Macaulay was calling attention to a fact of the first importance, but one that is constantly over­looked. It is systematically ignored today by nearly all governments, who are, at least by implication, constantly claiming for their own policies all the credit for all the economic improvement during their term of office.

This has been especially true since gross-national-product sta­tistics have been compiled. Spokes­men for the Truman Administra­tion boasted that the GNP in­creased from $211 billion in 1944 to $347 billion in 1952. Spokesmen for President Eisenhower pointed to the increase to $503 billion in 1960; spokesmen for President Kennedy to the increase to $584 billion in 1963; and spokesmen for President Johnson to the increase to $670 billion in 1965. But it re­mains to be determined to what extent these increases (even after allowance is made for a constant rise of dollar prices) were because or in spite of the government poli­cies followed.

Most European governments boast an even faster "economic growth," since the end of World War II, in their countries than in our own. But by far the greatest part of the credit for this growth must be given to the efforts of private citizens of these countries to improve their own condition. If the governments also deserve some credit, it is chiefly because they did not put too many restrictions and deterrents in the way.

Usual and Expected

The great fact that Macaulay emphasized, "the constant effort of every man to better himself," is important not only as it affects the question of who or what should receive the main credit for eco­nomic progress. It is the tremen­dously reassuring fact that all of us would do well to keep in mind as we read our daily newspapers. Too many of us become dis­heartened anew every morning as we read the sorry record of ac­cidents, divorces, quarrels, un­employment, diseases, deaths, bur­glaries, muggings, murders, riots, looting, racial violence, strikes, fires, revolts, revolutions, and war, as well as droughts, floods, and other natural disasters. We forget that the newspapers print the "news," and that the news means the unusual and unexpected.

We do not pick up our news­paper and read such items as "Strange case of virtue in the Bronx" or "More than 70 million people all over the United States went to their jobs yesterday morn­ing, working in factories, offices, and on farms till late afternoon. The police did not interfere." We do not read such items because they are the usual and the ex­pected.

The normal thing, in short, is not merely that most people are leading peaceable lives, but that most people are daily working and producing. Many are producing just enough to meet their current living expenses, but others are able to save something—in brief, to accumulate the capital, the money to create the new tools and equipment, that will make not only themselves but later genera­tions constantly more produc­tive.

Copyright Newsweek, Inc., September 27, 1965, and Henry Hazlitt.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

December 1965

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

July/August 2014

The United States' corporate tax burden is the highest in the world, but innovators will always find a way to duck away from Uncle Sam's reach. Doug Bandow explains how those with the means are renouncing their citizenship in increasing numbers, while J. Dayne Girard describes the innovative use of freeports to shield wealth from the myriad taxes and duties imposed on it as it moves around the world. Of course the politicians brand all of these people unpatriotic, hoping you won't think too hard about the difference between the usual crony-capitalist suspects and the global creative elite that have done so much to improve our lives. In a special tech section, Joseph Diedrich, Thomas Bogle, and Matthew McCaffrey look at various ways these innovators add value to our lives--even in ways they probably never expected.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION