Freeman

ARTICLE

The Engineers Obligation

JANUARY 01, 1957 by BEN MOREELL

Admiral Moreell, Chairman of the Board of Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation, was wartime Chief of the Bureau of Yards and Docks and Chief of Civil Engineers of the Navy.

 

Having spent the last half century in the pursuit of en­gineering knowledge and the prac­tice of engineering, I venture to offer some observations on the engineer’s obligations to society and to his fellow man.

In these days of ambitious striv­ing for political preferment, it is customary to bid high for the voters’ favor. Candidates hold forth tempting bait in the form of promises of government "hand­outs" in return for votes. Any reference to the obligation of citi­zens to preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States, or to their duty to strengthen the basic principles embodied in our Declaration of Independence is conspicuous by its absence. And were a candidate to couple his promises of "something for noth­ing" with an explanation that, since government produces noth­ing, it must take from someone else that which it gives away, he would surely raise grave question as to his sanity.

This appears to be an inversion of true values. There was a time when Americans looked upon their government as their servant whose duties are or should be restrained to the primary functions of pro­tecting the life, liberty, and hon­estly acquired property of every individual. As is traditional in the master-servant relationship, the people were morally bound to sup­port the government; but, in turn, the government was subject to the people’s commands.

Today, as we listen to eager as­pirants for public office, we must conclude that this old concept has changed. It appears that many of our people now believe that the government is obligated to support them and, at the same time, that it should have authority to tell them how to conduct their personal eco­nomic and social lives.

Does this state of affairs have special significance for engineers? I believe so. No other profession has profited more from the work of those who have gone before than have engineers. Starting with the invention of the wheel and proceeding through the long ages which culminate in our present era of jet propelled aircraft, the rec­ord of material progress consti­tutes a revealing account of the debt which we engineers owe to our intellectual and professional forebears.

It is an established fact that the most productive periods of history were those when men had the greatest measure of individual freedom. During those periods they had not only opportunity for personal development, but also in­centive for production, since they were permitted to retain a reason­able share of the fruits of their labor without fear of confiscation by private or public agencies or officials.

 

The Climate of Freedom

Since engineers are concerned with harnessing the forces of na­ture to serve the needs of man, it follows that they have a duty to foster the establishment of conditions conducive to this result, i.e., conditions which guarantee that man’s God-given rights to life, liberty, and the products of his honest labor are not impaired. This can be accomplished only if engi­neers participate in the processes of government, vigorously and in important degree.

Today the greatest threats to personal liberties arise, not from aggressions by foreign govern­ments, but from encroachments by governments upon the rights of their own citizens. If, overnight, all governments throughout the world were compelled by some supernatural power to confine their activities solely to the protection of the lives, liberties, and honestly acquired property of their own citizens, the world would be transformed. We would enter upon a period of unbelievable produc­tivity and prosperity. Even more important, all international ten­sions would disappear. It is only when governments coerce their citizens into supporting their am­bitious schemes on the interna­tional scene that conflicts arise and wars ensue.

In general, engineers are prone to be more concerned with the dis­covery of facts than with the dis­covery of the meanings of those facts as they apply to the development of mankind. My plea today is that we engineers, who are so heavily indebted to our intellectual forebears, resolve to discharge that debt by contributing to the ad­vancement of knowledge and the establishment of the climate which permits such advancement, the cli­mate of individual freedom.

For from freedom, we can de­rive peace. And with freedom and peace we can go forward to achieve life’s richest spiritual and material blessings for all people, every­where.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

January 1957

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

July/August 2014

The United States' corporate tax burden is the highest in the world, but innovators will always find a way to duck away from Uncle Sam's reach. Doug Bandow explains how those with the means are renouncing their citizenship in increasing numbers, while J. Dayne Girard describes the innovative use of freeports to shield wealth from the myriad taxes and duties imposed on it as it moves around the world. Of course the politicians brand all of these people unpatriotic, hoping you won't think too hard about the difference between the usual crony-capitalist suspects and the global creative elite that have done so much to improve our lives. In a special tech section, Joseph Diedrich, Thomas Bogle, and Matthew McCaffrey look at various ways these innovators add value to our lives--even in ways they probably never expected.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION