Freeman

ARTICLE

The Irresponsibles

AUGUST 01, 1962 by KENNETH W. SOLLITT

The Reverend Mr. Sollitt is Minister of the First Baptist Church of Midland, Michigan.

Consider the vast number of decisions made for us and the decreasing number of things we can, or for that matter, are willing to decide for ourselves. Parents, of necessity, decide things for their children. When the children are old enough, they are placed in schools where most of their decisions are made for them. After high school (or college) every able-bodied young man serves a stretch in the Armed Forces where to make a decision for him­self might be regarded as un-American activity!

After that training in conformity we get more of the same when we join a labor union and are told when to work and for how much, when to strike and for how long, and when we work not to work too hard. Or we may become big business executives and be told whom we can hire, how much we must pay them re­gardless of their value to us, whom we can fire and under what conditions, what we can produce, how much we can charge for goods or services, and how much we must pay Uncle Sam for his services in regulating us to death.

We don’t even make a decision as to what social functions we attend, what we’ll wear, whether we accept the cocktails offered us there—the society in which we move decides those things for thousands of so-called adults.

But you don’t achieve adulthood by letting others make all your decisions for you. Freedom is opportunity to make decisions. Character is ability to make right decisions. It can be achieved only in a climate of freedom. For no one learns to make right decisions without being free to make wrong ones. As our Ameri­can freedoms keep diminishing, so does the character of our people. Can irresponsibles form a responsible society?

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

August 1962

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION