The Market and Scarce Resources


Joseph Fulda is Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Hofstra University.

One of the most recurring canards levelled against the market is that it promotes the ravaging of our natural resources by profit-hungry businessmen, fails to urge conservation in the face of scarcity, creates pollution, and otherwise disfigures the natural environment. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a resource becomes scarcer and scarcer, its price rises in lockstep, thus assuring that wary consumers will conserve. Furthermore, the higher the price the more incentive a businessman has to try to produce more, and produce he will. Finally, alter natives to the resource, once too expensive, are now cheap by comparison. And, as Julian Simon points out in The Ultimate Resource, the human mind can always find an alternative which satisfies the same basic need as does a given resource.

When the resource is used in industry, not only is conservation promoted, but only those producers who can use the resource most efficiently will obtain it. Even after paying the price that scarcity has determined, they must still be able to turn a profit—no mean feat.

As for pollution and disfiguration of the natural environment, these are costs of the production process. But provided third-party effects are adequately remedied, they will be tolerated only so long as the consumer believes that the cost of pollution is worth bearing in light of the products he is to receive. The moment people generally believe that what is being produced is not worth the costs to the environment, they will cease paying the premium that those goods must of necessity include in their price to compensate the third parties whose properties are directly damaged by the production process.

Best of all, the pricing system works automatically, responding to even slight diminutions in the supply and to even slight changes in consumer preferences. The alternative to the market method of dealing with scarce natural resources is a system of allocation and rationing together with protective regulations which can never hope to match the discrimination and immediacy of the pricing system.


August 1984

comments powered by Disqus


* indicates required
Sign me up for...


July/August 2014

The United States' corporate tax burden is the highest in the world, but innovators will always find a way to duck away from Uncle Sam's reach. Doug Bandow explains how those with the means are renouncing their citizenship in increasing numbers, while J. Dayne Girard describes the innovative use of freeports to shield wealth from the myriad taxes and duties imposed on it as it moves around the world. Of course the politicians brand all of these people unpatriotic, hoping you won't think too hard about the difference between the usual crony-capitalist suspects and the global creative elite that have done so much to improve our lives. In a special tech section, Joseph Diedrich, Thomas Bogle, and Matthew McCaffrey look at various ways these innovators add value to our lives--even in ways they probably never expected.
Download Free PDF