Freeman

ARTICLE

The Natural History of Governmental Intervention

AUGUST 01, 1972 by MILTON FRIEDMAN

Mary Peterson persuasively illustrates for seven selected agencies what might be called the natural history of governmental intervention into economic affairs: A real or fancied evil leads to demands to "do something about it"; a political coalition forms consisting of sincere high-minded reformers and equally sincere interested parties; the incompatible objectives of the members of the coalition (e.g., low prices to consumers and high prices to producers) are glossed over by fine rhetoric about "the public interest," "fair competition," and the like; the coalition succeeds in getting Congress (or a state legislature) to pass a law; the preamble to the law entombs the rhetoric and the body of the law grants power to governmental officials to "do something"; the high-minded reformers experience a glow of triumph and turn their attention to new causes; the interested parties go to work to make sure that the power is used for their benefit and generally succeed; success breeds its problems, requiring the scope of intervention to broaden; bureaucracy takes its toll so that even the initial special interests no longer benefit; ultimately, the effects are precisely the opposite of the noble objectives of the high-minded reformers without achieving the more mundane objectives of the special interests; yet the activity is so firmly established and so many vested interests are connected with it that repeal of the initial legislation is nearly inconceivable; instead, new governmental legislation is called for to cope with the problems produced by the old; and a new cycle begins.

From Milton Friedman’s Introduction to The Regulated Consumer by Mary Bennett Peterson (Los Angeles: Nash Publishing, 1971).

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

August 1972

comments powered by Disqus

CURRENT ISSUE

May 2013

From natural systems to human systems, we start to notice patterns in nature that are products of good flow. Adrian Bejan discusses this crucial insight--and how it makes freedom even more needful--in this month's interview. Zachary Caceres looks at what emergence can tell us about the universe, the market, the heart, and the sacred; Mike Reid recounts the tragedies produced when the State tries to impose its order on people who have already developed their own; Gary Galles channels Leonard Read: the State is a clenched fist, he says, so it cannot create; Brad Taylor says democracy might just be another imposed order in some situations; Karl Borden wonders whether an individual's right to be left alone can be part of the order of things; and much, much more.Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

The Arena is a monthly debate feature designed to help readers explore issues of concern to classical liberals/libertarians.

This month, the issue is Gay Marriage. The proposition is: Gay Marriage Expands Liberty. Richard Lorenc will be arguing for the proposition. Steve Esposito will be arguing against the proposition.

img E-mail Subscription

VIEW PRIVACY POLICY