Freeman

ARTICLE

The Positive Approach

SEPTEMBER 01, 1964 by DEAN RUSSELL

The liberal-socialist is always positively for something. But the conservative-libertarian is all too frequently merely against some­thing. That’s why the socialists are winning.

Now personally I’m positively for every good thing there is. For example, I’m aggressively in favor of higher standards for education – and more and better education – than any socialist I ever met. I want the best possible medical care for everyone. With all my heart, I desire that every family in the United States and else­where shall be well fed, well clothed, and well housed.

I’m positively and vehemently for absolute equality under law, with no legal references whatever to a person’s race or religion. Whether a person is black, white, or Druid, I’ll march to gain for him the legal right to use his property for any purpose he wishes except to injure others.

While the socialists campaign for minimum wages and minimum standards of living, I shall con­tinue positively to explain to peo­ple how the free market will bring maximum wages, high standards, and more goods and services for everyone. I’m for the maximum and against the minimum.

If people only realized it, the advocates of these minimums and averages are their deadliest ene­mies. The socialists want to de­press the people to a common level; the libertarian wants to elevate each individual person to his highest capabilities.

The socialists want to standard­ize people; the libertarian wants to encourage and assist each per­son to develop his own personality and potentiality to the fullest.

The socialists want to restrict and forbid and control; the liber­tarian wants to remove the arti­ficial and man-made obstacles to peace, progress, and plenty.

Since that is what you and I favor, why don’t we say so? If we explain our viewpoints con­sistently and effectively, we will soon put the socialists on the de­fensive where they belong. For when it comes to an interest in the true welfare of people, the socialists are small men of little vision.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

September 1964

comments powered by Disqus

CURRENT ISSUE

May 2013

From natural systems to human systems, we start to notice patterns in nature that are products of good flow. Adrian Bejan discusses this crucial insight--and how it makes freedom even more needful--in this month's interview. Zachary Caceres looks at what emergence can tell us about the universe, the market, the heart, and the sacred; Mike Reid recounts the tragedies produced when the State tries to impose its order on people who have already developed their own; Gary Galles channels Leonard Read: the State is a clenched fist, he says, so it cannot create; Brad Taylor says democracy might just be another imposed order in some situations; Karl Borden wonders whether an individual's right to be left alone can be part of the order of things; and much, much more.Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

The Arena is a monthly debate feature designed to help readers explore issues of concern to classical liberals/libertarians.

This month, the issue is Gay Marriage. The proposition is: Gay Marriage Expands Liberty. Richard Lorenc will be arguing for the proposition. Steve Esposito will be arguing against the proposition.

img E-mail Subscription

VIEW PRIVACY POLICY