June Freeman 2013 Banner

BOOK REVIEW

The Tax Racket: Government Extortion from A to Z

The Income Tax Quells Economic Growth and Opportunity

JANUARY 01, 1996 by RAYMOND J. KEATING

Every tax levied by government somehow distorts economic decision-making and drains resources away from productive private-sector ventures. As Jean-Baptiste Say succinctly observed in his Treatise on Political Economy, “Taxes and restrictive measures never can be a benefit: they are at best a necessary evil. . . .”

Living in a misguided century, where big government mistakenly has come to be seen as a benevolent problem solver, individuals often avoid thinking about the many evils of taxation. Thankfully, Martin Gross’ book The Tax Racket: Government Extortion from A to Z serves as a stark reminder.

If the reader seeks an academic treatise on the economics of taxation, he should probably look elsewhere. The Tax Racket is meant to stir America’s anti-tax spirit. It surely accomplishes this mission. With little subtlety, Gross reveals the many costs and problems wrought by different forms of taxation. From airline levies and audits to withholding taxes and “zany tax stories,” Gross does indeed explain the evils of taxation from “A to Z.”

Along the way, the author offers some sound reform measures as well. For example, he calls for the elimination of capital gains taxes, the eventual privatization of Social Security as Chile has done, the end of county government and its commensurate tax burden, and believes that the IRS should be held accountable to a document called the Bill of Rights.

The primary target of The Tax Racket is the income tax. Gross essentially argues—and correctly I think—that the income tax remains the greatest evil among many evils. By its intrusive nature and legions of government IRS agents, the income tax constitutes an immediate affront to individual liberty. By directly raising the costs of working, investing, and risk-taking, the income tax quells economic growth and opportunity. As it was born by class warfare rhetoric, the income tax continues to feed mistaken and dangerous class-based thinking. As already noted, every tax brings with it many problems, but none seemingly so vast and distasteful as the income tax.

Gross wisely argues for disposing of all income taxes—federal, state, and local. Before getting into what kind of tax should replace the income tax, he first outlines a plan for greatly reducing the size of government. So while Gross calls for the income tax to be replaced partially with a national retail sales tax (bringing with it a different, though less severe, set of problems), Gross understands that the most sound “substitute” for an income tax is substantial government spending reductions.

In the perverse vernacular of today’s public policy debates, a suggestion to cut taxes is met by the question: how will you “pay for” your tax cut? The best answer remains: cut government spending.

When combining The Tax Racket with two of his previous bestsellers—The Government Racket: Washington Waste from A to Z and A Call for Revolution: How Washington Is Strangling America—And How to Stop It—one realizes that Martin Gross may indeed be the Stephen King of the anti-government crowd. That is, he tells horror stories in an entertaining fashion. Fortunately, though, if his advice eventually is heeded on eliminating the income tax and cutting government spending, the story will have a happy ending.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

January 1996

comments powered by Disqus

img E-mail Subscription

VIEW PRIVACY POLICY

CURRENT ISSUE

June 2013

Cities are vast, complex orders that emerge from the voluntary actions of millions of people. In this issue, we take a look at them, from Sandy Ikeda's examination of the invisible blueprints that define cities, to Rod Lockwood's concept of a free city that could rescue Detroit, to Troy Camplin's theories of why cities exemplify the unity of paradox that defines beauty. Speaking of beauty, we reintroduce poetry to The Freeman. We also introduce The Arena, a monthly debate feature, and much, much more.Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

The Arena is a monthly debate feature designed to help readers explore issues of concern to classical liberals/libertarians.

This month, the issue is immigration. The proposition is: The US should open its borders. Nathan Smith will be arguing for the proposition. A. M. Fantini will be arguing against the proposition.

Blinking Lights Project

The Blinking Lights Project is a new effort designed to highlight and emphasize the vital link between personal character and a free society. Learn more.