Freeman

PERSPECTIVE

What's Happening?

Government Is Taking Steps to Alter Fundamentally Our Way of Life

OCTOBER 01, 2002 by SHELDON RICHMAN

Every day brings news of another government threat to our liberty. President Bush has asked for a new look at the posse comitatus law, which prohibits use of the military in domestic law enforcement. He also called for “a nationwide program giving millions of American truckers, letter carriers, train conductors, ship captains, utility employees, and others a formal way to report suspicious terrorist activity.”

Both statements were ominous. Fortunately, the citizen-monitoring proposal, Project TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System–who comes up with these puerile names?) appears to be dead, thanks to the leader of the President’s own party in the House of Representatives. The idea of training meter readers to do some snooping while going about their seemingly innocuous business is unworthy of this country’s original ideals. Must we begin being concerned about what magazines are on our coffee tables when the cable guy comes over?

The posse comitatus principle has been a valuable tradition in American life. The use of the military in civilian matters better fits authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

These are not the first steps this government has taken to alter fundamentally our way of life. It is holding foreign nationals without charge and sometimes incommunicado. It claims–and has exercised–the authority to hold, indefinitely without charge, American citizens it has branded “enemy combatants.” We are seeing the erosion of that august principle, habeas corpus. Federal agents may now more easily electronically eavesdrop, monitor peaceable assembly, and secretly search premises and seize possessions.

It is all under the cover of combating terrorism, of course. But that makes it no less discomforting. It looks too much like government’s doing what it has always done: seizing on a terrible event to expand its power.

***

Favoring medical privacy is like favoring virtue. No one dares come out against it. But when you read the details of the rules being written in Washington, you’ll wonder if we live in a “hypocracy.” Sue Blevins explains.

It’s not only medical privacy that’s at risk nowadays. How’d you like to be required to carry a national ID card with you? David Brown wouldn’t.

The current business scandals have launched the latest blame game. Harold Jones and Paul Jones want to know why the real culprit isn’t on the field.

What exactly is government? Read its firsthand account, as told to Doug MacKenzie.

Part of the frenzied reaction to the business scandals involves changing how corporations account for executive stock options. Anthony de Jasay says that, as to be expected, the “reform” would be a mistake.

Are the rich meat eaters of the world starving the poor would-be grain eaters? Jeremy Rifkin thinks so. Dennis Avery doesn’t.

There’s an impression that commercial aviation was deregulated in the 1980s. If so, why aren’t foreign airlines allowed to compete with domestic carriers within the United States? Paul Cleveland and Jared Price expose the folly of this protectionism.

If the welfare state is really the way to raise living standards, then why do American blacks live better than Swedes? Thomas Woods has an answer to that and other conundrums.

Most intellectuals favor government control and social engineering. Maybe it’s because they’ve never lived in the real world. Stephen Browne relates a lesson from the other side of the defunct iron curtain.

Have you heard of the New Urbanism? Unfortunately, sooner or later you will. C.C. Kraemer prepares you for the coming debate.

Everything is not bleak in the world of public policy. People are starting to realize that subsidies to rich Western farmers hurt people in the developing world. Scott McPherson has the details.

There’s nothing more commonplace than the municipal library. Ted Roberts wants to know why.

Like grass sprouting through cracks in a sidewalk, trade will flourish anywhere it can, regardless of government prohibitions. Jim Peron has observed street traders in South Africa and finds some important lessons.

The people enjoy television chef Emeril, but the critics don’t. Larry Schweikart says, “So what’s new?”

Have we got columns! Lawrence Reed finds the pharmaceutical market woefully misunderstood. Doug Bandow reminds us that only Congress may declare war. Robert Higgs considers two Brain Trusts. Donald Boudreaux says don’t shoot the messenger. Walter Williams believes people should be free to sell their organs. And Aeon Skoble, reading the charge that America is becoming a plutocracy, protests, “It Just Ain’t So!”

Reviewers this month curled up with books on the myths of gun control, the misuse of statistics, the Panama Canal, the Microsoft antitrust case, government priorities, and “liberal” political theory.

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

October 2002

ABOUT

SHELDON RICHMAN

Sheldon Richman is the former editor of The Freeman and TheFreemanOnline.org, and a contributor to The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. He is the author of Separating School and State: How to Liberate America's Families.

comments powered by Disqus

EMAIL UPDATES

* indicates required
Sign me up for...

CURRENT ISSUE

September 2014

For centuries, hierarchical models dominated human organizations. Kings, warlords, and emperors could rally groups--but also oppress them. Non-hierarchical forms of organization, though, are increasingly defining our lives. It's no secret how this shift has benefited out social lives, including dating, and it's becoming more commonplace even in the corporate world. But it has also now come even to organizations bent on domination rather than human flourishing, as the Islamic State shows. If even destructive groups rely on this form of entrepreneurial organization, then hierarchy's time could truly be coming to an end.
Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION