Freeman

ARTICLE

Why Liberty?

MAY 01, 1959 by EDMUND OPITZ

A man who can ask the right questions, observes Plato some­where, has thereby obtained nine-tenths of his answer already. Such is certainly the case in this matter of liberty. For centuries men per­sisted in asking the wrong ques­tions. “Who,” they queried, “will set us free?” Or, “Who will give us freedom?” Invariably they got the wrong answers. Freedom, it is implied by these questions, is a prerogative to be pried away from some earthly sovereign; or, alternatively, freedom is to be es­tablished merely be replacing the old authorities with new ones.

It was only with the gradual dawning of the belief that men participate in the divine ration­ality and are endowed with free will that they began to ask the right questions about liberty. When men believe they have inner freedom, they will demand that it be matched by outer liberty as a natural condition essential to the working out of their salvation.If God will not override man’s free will, how can it be lawful for any mere man or collective to do so?” The public authority, they con­cluded, has no other function than to defend the life and liberty of all men alike.

But even a good answer to the right sort of question may become an embalmed impediment to fur­ther questioning. Thinking they had the right answer once and for all, men ceased to ask the proper questions—with the result that the old answers lost almost every­thing but their labels. Look what has happened to “liberalism"!

Thus it is imperative that we start again to ask the right ques­tions; about human nature, about man’s place in the universe as well as in society, about government and the nature of human liberty. This Pierre Goodrich does in his usual trenchant and penetrating way in his Mont Pelerin paper, Why Liberty? A copy of this timely message, a 15-page reprint, may be had for the asking. Write to the Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson, N. Y. 

ASSOCIATED ISSUE

May 1959

comments powered by Disqus

CURRENT ISSUE

May 2013

From natural systems to human systems, we start to notice patterns in nature that are products of good flow. Adrian Bejan discusses this crucial insight--and how it makes freedom even more needful--in this month's interview. Zachary Caceres looks at what emergence can tell us about the universe, the market, the heart, and the sacred; Mike Reid recounts the tragedies produced when the State tries to impose its order on people who have already developed their own; Gary Galles channels Leonard Read: the State is a clenched fist, he says, so it cannot create; Brad Taylor says democracy might just be another imposed order in some situations; Karl Borden wonders whether an individual's right to be left alone can be part of the order of things; and much, much more.Download Free PDF

PAST ISSUES

SUBSCRIBE

RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

THE ARENA

The Arena is a monthly debate feature designed to help readers explore issues of concern to classical liberals/libertarians.

This month, the issue is Gay Marriage. The proposition is: Gay Marriage Expands Liberty. Richard Lorenc will be arguing for the proposition. Steve Esposito will be arguing against the proposition.

img E-mail Subscription

VIEW PRIVACY POLICY